University of Washington
Math Logo

Left Navigation Bar

Mathematics Department and Graduate School Colloquium Archive
2004-2005
 
October 12, 2004 at 4pm
Communications 120
Steven G. Krantz
Washington University, St. Louis
The Worm Turns
In 1977 Klas Diederich and John Erik Fornaess produced a stunning example---the worm domain---to provide a counterexample to a longstanding conjecture about the geometry of domains in complex space. In more recent years, the worm domain has proved to be important in other contexts, particularly in the study of the -Neumann problem. In joint work with Marco Peloso, we study the harmonic analysis of the worm domain. In particular, we calculate the Bergman kernel and study mapping properties of the Bergman projection.

Understanding this talk requires a central nervous system and some acquaintance with complex analysis. A benign and salubrious attitude towards the speaker can serve as a substitute for any of these attributes.
 
October 26, 2004 at 4pm
Communications 120
Tadeusz Januszkiewicz
Ohio State University
Simplicial Nonpositive Curvature

Based on joint work with Jacek Świątkowski (Wroclaw University).

A particularly useful class of spaces in geometric group theory is the one of (locally) CAT(-1), (and CAT(0)) spaces: metric spaces of negative (or nonpositive) curvature with no assumption of smoothness.

The main source of high dimensional spaces of that kind are combinatorial constructions involving cubical complexes. In 1987 Gromov realized that there is a beautifully simple combinatorial condition on a cubical complex, which is equivalent to the a priori noncombinatorial CAT(0) condition. The theory of CAT(0) cubical complexes is fairly well developed by now.

In recent work, Jacek Świątkowski and myself asked for the corresponding story for simplical rather than cubical complexes. What we got was somewhat surprising: we could not formulate a simple combinatorial condition equivalent to the CAT(0) property, but found a very simple condition--Simplicial NonPositive Curvature (SNPC)--which, without implying CAT(0), has many of its consequences. The condition also admits strengthenings which do imply CAT(0).

I plan to explain some background on CAT(0), tell you what SNPC is, how one works with it, and show some similarities (and dissimilarities) with nonpositively curved spaces we are familiar with.
 

November 9, 2004 at 4pm
Communications 120
Angela Gibney
University of Pennsylvania
The Moduli Space of Curves of Genus g

Colloquium: The Moduli Space of Curves of Genus g
Algebraic curves of genus g are parametrized by an algebraic variety (more accurately a scheme or a stack) called Mg, the moduli space of curves of genus g. There has been intense interest in Mg from Physics and many areas of mathematics including algebraic geometry and topology. The moduli space is both interesting in its own right and because by studying it, one can learn about the individual curves it parametrizes. In this talk I'm going to give a survey of this beautiful space including mentioning an open problem, which if true when the genus is zero, then is true for all genera.

November 8th Grad Student Seminar, 4pm, THO 119: What is a Family of Algebraic Curves of Genus g?
In algebraic geometry one of the main objects of study are algebraic varieties. One dimensional algebraic varieties are first of all classified by an invariant called genus. I'm going to introduce families of curves of genus g and by giving lots of examples, motivate how one can learn about a particular curve by viewing it as a member of a family of curves.
 

November 16, 2004 at 4pm
Communications 120
Marshall Hampton
University of Minnesota
Smale's Sixth Problem: A Solution for the Four-body Problem
In 1998 Steven Smale formulated 18 problems for the 21st century. The 6th problem is: are the number of relative equilibria in the n-body problem finite for positive masses? I will explain the motivation and background for this problem, and then describe a solution in the four-body case (joint work with Richard Moeckel). The proof exploits the beautiful connection between the Newton polytopes of a system of polynomial equations and the solutions to those equations.
 
November 23, 2004 at 4pm
Communications 120
Sun-Yung Alice Chang
Princeton University
Conformal Invariants, Q-curvature and Ricci Tensor

Colloquium: Conformal Invariants, Q-curvature and Ricci Tensor
Based on the work of C. Fefferman and R. Graham in 1985, there have been systematic study of the conformal invariants and conformally covariant operators on manifolds of any dimensions.  A special case of such an operator is a fourth order linear elliptic operator with its leading symbol the bi-Laplace operator called the Paneitz operator.  In this talk, I will discuss study of this operator on four manifolds, its associated curvature function called the Q-curvature, connection of Q-curvature to the study of eigenvalues of the Ricci tensor and applications to some problems in geometry.  I will also discuss some open questions in the area.

November 22nd Grad Student Seminar, 4pm, THO 119: How can we tell it is the sphere?
Given a compact, closed manifold, how can we tell it is differomorphic to the standard sphere?  When the dimension of the manifold is two, i.e. when we are on a compact surface, we may apply the Gauss-Bonnet formula and decide from the sign of the integral of the Gaussian curvature over the surface to tell if the surface is a sphere, a torus or a hyperbolic ball.  When the dimension of the manifold is bigger than 2, there are many great efforts to seek analytic or curvature quantities to distinguish the sphere.  In this talk, I will describe some effort in this direction using analysis and PDE methods.  Exposing the fact that the conformal transformation group of the sphere is not compact, I will discuss a blow-up sequence of functions which are extremals of a Sobolev embedding inequality and relation of the embedding to the Yamabe problem.  I will also discuss efforts in characterizing the n-sphere via some n-th order conformal invariants.
 

November 30, 2004 at 4pm
Communications 120
Boris Solomyak
University of Washington
Substitution Dynamical Systems
A substitution dynamical system is given by the shift map on a space of infinite sequences produced by simple rules.
The classical example of such a system arises from the Morse sequence, obtained by iterating the substitution 0 -> 01, 1 -> 10. Marston Morse introduced it in 1921 to show the existence of recurrent nonperiodic geodesics on surfaces of negative curvature. (The same sequence was studied by Prouhet in 1851 and by Thue in 1906, so it is now sometimes called the Prouhet-Thue-Morse sequence.) The interest in such systems is that they are (usually) nonperiodic, but are highly "ordered," e.g. recurrent in a very strong quantitative sense.

I will sketch some of the history of these systems, applications in other fields (number theory, Schrödinger operators, tilings and quasicrystals), and describe some open problems.

Click here to view slides from this talk.
 

February 15, 2005 at 4pm
Communications 120
Yvonne Choquet-Bruhat
Faculte des Sciences de Paris and l'Universite Pierre et Marie Curie
From the Big Bang to Future Complete Cosmologies
Colloquium: From the Big Bang to Future Complete Cosmologies
The Einstein equations are a system of second order partial differential equations which are essentially equivalent, up to constraints to be satisfied by Cauchy initial data, to a system of quasilinear wave equations. The local Cauchy problem has been solved long ago. For the global problem there are only partial results. We consider in this talk the so called cosmological case, that is the case of a spacetime with space a compact 3-manifold. The only nonsingular spacetime product of such space by a line satisfying the Einstein equations is then flat, i.e. of zero Riemannian curvature. All other models have a singularity, say in the past. Their completeness in the future is a question under active study. We will review briefly recent results in this area, in particular those obtained for spacetimes admitting a spatial isometry group in collaboration with J. Isenberg and V. Moncrief.

February 14th Grad Student Seminar, 4pm, THO 134: General Relativity, Overview and Prospects
We will first outline the geometrical definition of a spacetime of general relativity, together with its original physical motivations. Then we will explain what are the Einstein equations governing its dynamics and give the classical model of the most current use which has received confirmation under observation. Finally we will briefly survey some recent results and open problems in black holes and cosmology which make General Relativity the most remarkably successful and also puzzling mathematical and physical theory.
 

February 22, 2005 at 4pm
Communications 120
Adrian Lewis
Cornell University
Stable Polynomials, Nonsmooth Optimization, and Belgian Chocolate
A polynomial is "stable" if all its roots lie in the left half-plane. A fundamental and difficult problem in control theory is to find a stable polynomial from some given family. In 1994, V. Blondel offered a prize of a kilogram of chocolate for solving a particular instance. A new nonsmooth optimization algorithm based on "gradient sampling" leads to a strikingly simple solution to Blondel's problem. I will outline this algorithm, discuss its properties, and describe how the variational structure of the set of stable polynomials results in the form of the optimal solution we find.

Joint work with J. Burke, D. Henrion, S. Henderson, M. Overton.
 
March 8, 2005 at 4pm
Communications 120
Eric Babson
University of Washington
Enumerative Geometry
Roughly speaking, enumerative geometry consists of those algebro-geometric problems in which one tries to count the number of a certain class of geometric objects satisfying given conditions. For example, given 5 points in the plane, no three of which are collinear, how many conic sections pass through all of them? (Answer: 1.) In order for such a problem to have a chance of having a well-defined solution, certain conditions must be met. One particularly simple setting is that of the Schubert calculus in which the objects being counted are subspaces.
 
April 5, 2005 at 4pm
Smith 211
Ulrike Tillmann
Oxford University
Strings and Moduli Spaces of Riemann Surfaces--A Topologist's View
Colloquium: Strings and Moduli Spaces of Riemann Surfaces--A Topologist's View
The moduli spaces of Riemann surfaces are fundamental mathematical objects which are central to complex analysis, algebraic geometry and topology.  The systematic study of their cohomology was initiated by Mumford in the early 1980s.  Much recent interest in the subject has been motivated by mathematical physics, in particular string theory.

I will give an overview and in particular explain how a homotopy theoretic approach led to the recent proof by Madsen and Weiss of Mumford's conjecture on the rational stable cohomology of moduli space (obtained by letting the genus tend to infinity).

April 4th Grad Student Seminar, 4pm, THO 119: Groups, Categories, and Classifying Spaces
A good way to study a discrete group is to study spaces on which it acts. Much can be learned from the topology of its orbit space and the stabilizer subgroups.  Of particular interest are those spaces which admit a free group action and which are topologically trivial.  Their orbit spaces are 'classifying spaces' for covering spaces, as I will explain.  Vice-versa, it is easy to recover the group from its classifying space.

In his thesis in 1968, Graeme Segal introduced the notion of a classifying space for categories which has now become a basic construction in topology.  In part as a preparation for the colloquium talk I plan to discuss how extra structure on the category leads to extra structure on the associated classifying space, and how much the classifying space remembers of the category.
 

April 19, 2005 at 4pm
Communications 120
Gunther Uhlmann
University of Washington
Inside-Out: Inverse Problems
Inverse problems arise in practical situations such as medical imaging, geophysical exploration, and non-destructive evaluation where measurements made on the exterior of a body are used to determine properties of the inaccessible interior. The purpose of this lecture is to present some of the ideas involved in the considerable mathematical progress made in understanding these problems during the last twenty five years.

Computed Tomography (CT) is probably the most familiar inverse problem. In this imaging method the attenuation in intensity of an X-ray beam is measured, and the information from many X-rays from different sources is assembled and analyzed to recover the density of internal tissues.
Mathematically it is a problem of recovering a function from the set of its line integrals (or the set of its plane integrals). Radon found in the
early part of the 20th century a formula to recover a function from this information. Although this formula was found on purely theoretical considerations its numerical implementation is used in most algorithms for CT scans.

In this lecture I will also describe two other inverse problems. One is Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT). In this inverse method one attempts to determine the electrical conductivity of a medium by making voltage and current measurements at the boundary. One potential application is early breast cancer detection. The problem, in mathematical terms, is to determine the coefficient of a partial differential equation by measuring the boundary values of the solutions of the equation and the normal derivatives at the boundary of the solutions.

The second problem is travel time tomography. In this inverse problem one attempts to determine the sound speed of a medium by measuring at the boundary the first arrivals times of waves going through the medium. The motivation of this problem came originally from Geophysics: Can one determine the inner structure of the Earth by measuring the travel times of seismic waves? Mathematically this problem can be restated as the question of determining a Riemannian metric of a Riemannian manifold with boundary by knowing the lengths of geodesics connecting points on the boundary.

I will also describe a surprising connection between travel time tomography and EIT. I will assume during this lecture no previous knowledge of partial differential equations or differential geometry.
 
April 26, 2005 at 4pm
Communications 120
Marianna Csörnyei
University College in London
On the Visibility of Invisible Sets
Colloquium: On the Visibility of Invisible Sets
A planar set A is called invisible, if its orthogonal projection is of measure 0 in almost every direction; A is visible, if it is not invisible. We say that A is invisible from a point, if almost all lines through that point do not hit the set. P. Mattila raised the poetic question whether the set of points from which an invisible set is visible is invisible.

R.O. Davies proved in 1952 that an arbitrary measurable planar set A can be covered by lines in such a way that the set of all points covered by these lines has the same Lebesgue measure as A. We prove that the same result holds not only for Lebesgue measure, but for every reasonable measure on the plane. We show how this result may be used to answer the question of Mattila, and we characterise the sets of the plane from which an invisible set is visible. We also answer some other problems about lines intersecting sets.

April 25th Grad Student Seminar, 4pm, THO 119: Whitney's Extension Theorem and Related Problems
H. Whitney studied in 1934 which functions $f:\,A\to\ {\mathbb R}$ can be extended from a subset $A\subset{\mathbb R}^n$ to ${\mathbb R}^n$ as a $C^m$ function. In particular, he showed that there is a continuous curve on the plane and a $C^1$-function $f$ with $f'(x)=0$ at each point of the curve, such that $f$ is not constant along the curve. That is, one can climb up to the top of a mountain along a curve in such a way that he moves all the time only horizontally!

We will study Whitney's extension theorem and related problems, old and new.
 

May 10, 2005 at 4pm
Communications 120
Krzysztof Burdzy
University of Washington
Is Probability a Field of Mathematics?

The talk will consist of two parts. The first one (hopefully short) will deal with the philosophical question of what makes a field a part of mathematics (Hint: a collection of rigorous definitions, theorems and proofs is not necessarily a field of mathematics). In the second part I will argue (surprise, surprise) that probability is indeed a field of mathematics. The concept of "probability" is now an abstract mathematical notion, often unrelated to any real world randomness. I will present a number of examples of purely technical uses of probability measures in mathematics.
 

May 17, 2005 at 4pm
Communications 120
Alejandro Adem
University of British Columbia
Periodic Complexes and Group Actions

A classical problem in topology is that of characterizing those finite groups that act fixed-point freely on a sphere. In this talk we will review these results and describe recent work towards extending this to (i) a product of two spheres and (ii) actions of discrete groups. The methods we use are a combination of techniques in topology and group theory.
 

May 31, 2005 at 4pm
Communications 120
Margaret Cheney
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Synthetic Aperture Radar
Colloquium: Synthetic Aperture Radar
In Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) imaging, a plane or satellite carrying an antenna flies along a (usually straight) flight path. The antenna emits pulses of electromagnetic radiation; this radiation scatters off the terrain and is received back at the same antenna. These signals are used to produce an image of the terrain.

One of the key technologies involved in SAR imaging is mathematics. This talk will show some SAR images and explain the basic mathematics behind the formation of high-resolution images.

June 1st Grad Student Seminar, 4pm, THO 119: Imaging and Inverse Problems
Radar imaging, seismic imaging, and medical imaging all require sophisticated mathematical processing to form an image. The mathematics involved often takes the form of an ``inverse problem'', in which one tries to deduce the coefficient in a differential equation from partial knowledge of the solution of the equation. This talk will discuss examples of various inverse problems, features of such problems, and some of the mathematics involved in addressing them.

 


The University of Washington is committed to providing access, equal opportunity and reasonable accommodation in its services, programs, activities, education and employment for individuals with disabilities. To request disability accommodation, contact the Disability Services Office at least ten days in advance at: 206-543-6450/V, 206-543-6452/TTY, 206-685-3885/FAX, or dso@u.washington.edu.
 

HOME   |   DEPARTMENT NEWS   |   PEOPLE   |   EVENTS AND TALKS   |   UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM   |   GRADUATE PROGRAM
RESEARCH   |   VIGRE   |   K-12   |   GENERAL INFORMATION   |   UNIVERSITY LINKS   |   SEARCH
U of W Website Terms of Conditions and Use   |   U of W Online Privacy Statement
PRINTER FRIENDLY FORMAT
Please send comments, corrections, and suggestions to: webmaster[at]math.washington.edu