Problem Correspondence for Exam 2

If Exam 2 did not go as well as you hoped, then you should go back and think about how you studied. To help you do this, I have listed where and when you should have seen problems like those on the exam. Many of the exam problems were almost identitical to homework, old exams, or entry task problems.

You certainly should have at least looked at all the exams and homework problems listed below (there is no excuse for not studying all of these problems). So the question becomes, why did you think you understood it when you were studying and why did your studying not lead to you being able to do the problems on the test.

PROBLEM 1 (Linear-to-linear modeling)

FROM HW: 12.6, 12.7, 12.8, 12.10, 12.11
FROM OLD EXAMS:
CONROY: Spr. 07/#2, Winter 07/#2
LOVELES: Fall 06/#1
and many, many, many more

PROBLEM 2 (Trigonometry)

FROM HW: 15.4, 15.7, 15.8
FROM OLD EXAMS:
CONROY: Winter 07/#4, Winter 06/#4
LOVELES: Fall 06/#4
and many, many, many more

PROBLEM 3 (Inverses)

FROM HW: 11.2, 11.7, 11.8, 11.9
FROM OLD EXAMS:
CONROY: Fall 04/#2, Winter 04/#1
LOVELES: Fall 06/#5
TAGGART: Spring 03/#1
and many, many, many more

PROBLEM 4 (Circular Motion)

FROM HW: 15.2, 15.10, 15.15
FROM OLD EXAMS:
CONROY: Fall 06/#3, Spr. 07/#3
LOVELES: Fall 05/#5, Fall 06/#2
and many, many, many more

PROBLEM 5 (Arithmetic and Functions)

FROM HW: 10.4, 10.5, 10.8
FROM OLD EXAMS:
CONROY: Fall 06/#1, Spring 06/#4
LOVELES: Fall 06/#5
and many, many, many more