It's been awhile since that first picture was taken.
Two quarters have passed and most of us have still stuck together.
That's very unusual for a fig; so ususual that someone decided to write an article about the best FIG that has ever existed at the UW in the paper....






Reprinted from University Week, May 9, 1996



Like Duracell, Collingwood kept on teaching, and teaching...

my beloved fig
friends

Some people would say that David Collingwood is working above and beyond the call of duty. Some people would say he's crazy. What Collingwood himself says is that what he's doing is so rewarding, it's worth all the effort. At least eight UW students would agree, since they've had the benefit of Collingwood's nearly undivided attention for the full academic year.

It all started last summer, when Collingwood, a professor of mathematics, was asked if he would be interested in being a part of a Freshman Interest Group connected to the UWired Program. Collingwood was already slated to teach the fall quarter Math 120, a 160-Student Precalculus class, and the FIG would be part of that class. After attending some orientation meetings, he agreed to sign on.

In Math 120, students attend a lecture with the professor three days a week then meet with a teaching assistant twice a week. The students in the UWired FIG met an additional two times a week in the collaboratory at Odegaard Undergraduate Library. There, the group learned how to use information technology.

It happened that this particular FIG was unusually small - just 10 students, all science or engineering majors. Although it wasn't required, Collingwood made the commitment to attend all the sessions in the collaboratory. He was therefore meeting with these 10 students every day of the week, twice in a small group setting.

"One of the goals of the Freshman Interest Group Program is to create small learning communities, and that certainly happened in our group," Collingwood says of the experience. "Because we were meeting in a small group twice a week, and because we were exploring technology together, there was a lot of one-to-one interaction. So we really connected pretty well."

When it came time to register for Math 124, the first quarter of calculus, the students began asking Collingwood if he would be teaching it and he said no. As director of the graduate program in his department, he's only required to teach one quarter per year. "And then I started thinking about it and I realized I could teach them calculus," Collingwood says. "I could just do it. I could just voluntarily teach these students calculus, even though it's in addition to what I already have to do."

He had a few misgivings. What about the fairness issue? Initially, Collingwood had worried about grading his FIG students in Math 120, but then, math grades are based on solving problems on tests. Answers are clearly right or wrong, no subjectivity involved, so he dismissed that issue. But what about the idea of teaching a class of 10 students calculus? Other students would take the class in the usual 160 - student format. Wouldn't this be unfair to them?

"In the end I decided that since I was doing this voluntarily, for no extra compensation, it wasn't unfair," Collingwood says. "But I checked with my chair first, just to be sure. When he heard what I intended to do, he was speechless for a few minutes. Then I showed him a memo I'd written describing my experience withe fhte FIG to the assistant dean of undergraduate education, and he told me we could turn the lights off on campus and the glow from my memo would provide plenty of illumination."

The memo said, in part, "Without question, my experience this quarter has been one of the most rewarding, exciting and fulfilling of my career."

That was in December. Collingwood probably would write something even more glowing today, after teaching this same small group not only Math 124, but Math 125 as well. And the feeling is mutual. One of the students, Allyson Keith, is not a freshman but is new to the University. "I've been through the college experience before," she says, "and it's just so amazingly different having such a small group and working with a real professor one on one most of the time. You can ask questions whenever you want to."

"It's just a lot of personal attention," adds Nora Vasquez. "He knows what our strengths and weaknesses are and can present the material with a different twist to cater to our needs."

Angela Garcia says she had signed up for the FIG because she comes from a small town and was worried about surviving in such a big university. "I was really grateful for this experience because there are only a few of us and we can get to really understand the material instead of just trying to get through the class."

Though his 10 students have dwindled down to eight (two dropped in winter quarter), those remaining enjoy the relaxed atmosphere of the class. On a recent morning, the group was studying a concept known as "solids of revolution," in which the volume of a solid is calculated by visualizing revolving it on an axis. To illustrate the concept, Collingwood had brought solids of various types: a washer, a football, a rivet and a whole bag of bagels (which were eaten after class). Instead of demonstrating to the class how each one's volume would be calculated, he asked students to give their ideas on the matter first. Being able to do that is, he believes, one of the biggest advantages to having a small class.

"I'm trying to draw things out of them and let them say a lot of things that are possibly wrong," Collingwood says. "That's something that undergraduates don't have the opportunity to do in these gateway courses - learn how to think and reason creatively, critically, actively. So I'm trying to get them started on that road. And it's painful because nobody wants to say something that's wrong."

These students, however, have learned to take the chance. In fact, they say their bravery has carried over into other, larger classes, where they're less afraid no to ask questions. "I don't even think about it now," says Keith. "I just want to get my question answered."

Adds Vasquez, "What I think also, you get to know one profesor, it makes it easier to go to other professors during their office hours."

By now, Collingwood has gotten to know these students very well, but once again, he hasn't worried about favoritism because of the impersonal nature of mathematics. And they're not all 4.0 students, he says. In fact, the class approximates the normal curve, only on a smaller scale. However, none of these students is failing. Collectively, they've done quite well. When they were in the 160-student class last fall, their mean scores topped the mean of the class by about 10 poiints.

"I think what happened is, they realilzed that I cared a lot about their progress in my class and in the Univeristy," Collingwood says. "I think they were really trying to work hard in my class to succeed."

Collingwood has worked hard too, but found the work rewarding. "It's exciting to have a chance to teach a course tailored to a group of students, that captures their interest," he says. "As a researcher I'm sort of a passionate and creative person, and I've enjoyed funneling that creativity and passion towards teaching calculus in the most exciting and interesting way possible."

As spring quarter comes to a close, so will Collingwood's formal association with these students. He won't be repeating the experiment next year ("I'd have a coronary"), but he says he'd consider doing it again sometime. "It's without question the best teaching experience I've had, period - graduate or undergraduate."


Nancy Wick