Summary of Midterm Student Feedback

MATH 124 and 125

Spring 2004

 

 

         This report presents a summary of the student perceptions gathered in the midterm feedback sessions facilitated for the Department of Mathematics by staff from the Center for Instructional Development and Research in April/May 2004.  The feedback was gathered in MATH 124 and 125, in a total of 11 sections.

 

Midterm Feedback Session Process

 

         Each feedback session was first introduced by the instructor, who explained to the students the two purposes for gathering feedback: (1) for the instructor to find out immediately student perceptions of their learning in the course, and (2) for the department to use in assessing the changes being made in the first two quarters of the calculus sequence.  After the introduction, the instructor left the room, and the facilitator explained the process to the students and described how their feedback would be communicated first to the instructor and then to the department.  Then students met in small groups to discuss and record responses to the questions on the feedback worksheet (see attached).  After the students had worked in their small groups for approximately seven minutes, the facilitator led a full class discussion of responses to Questions A and B on the worksheet (“What’s helping you learn?” and “What’s not helping you learn?  What suggestions do you have?”).  Notes were taken on the overhead during the large group discussion.  Question C was not discussed in the large group.

 

Instructor Feedback Reports

 

         The feedback from each section was compiled, categorized, and written up in an individual report for the instructor.  The facilitator then met with the instructor to discuss the student feedback and possible strategies for responding to the feedback.

 

Summary Report

 

         For this summary report, all feedback from each class – from the four sections of MATH 124 and the seven sections of MATH 125 – was compiled, categorized and summarized.  The report lists the main themes that emerged from the student feedback data.  The number of groups commenting on each topic is included, and representative comments from the group worksheets are provided.  Any reference to individual instructors, teaching assistants and sections is omitted.

 


Math 124 Midterm Feedback – Spring 2004

 

Feedback gathered during Week 5 in 4 sections taught by 3 instructors

Total number of students participating in feedback process = 187

Total number of groups = 43

 

A. What is helping you learn? (131 group comments)

 

LECTURE (38 group comments)

   Examples and explanations – lots of examples, thorough explanations (23 groups, 4 sections)

“Lectures – with professor’s examples (examples being done on overhead) makes it easier to see how to work through problems.”

“Lecture, particularly the abundant examples that are given in class.”

“Professor thoroughly explains the concepts to be taught in lecture by using examples in ‘lay’ terms.”

“Lecture has complex examples helping us apply different ‘steps’ and ideas into future problems.”

“Lecture ‘you do’ problems.”

   Organization – writes everything on overhead, pace (8 groups, 4 sections)

“Going over material at a good pace.”

“The organization and depth of detail of the lecture – and the providing of lots of example problems.”

“Writes everything out on overhead.”

“Nice lecture structure.”

   Other (5 groups, 3 sections)

 

RESOURCES (30 group comments)

   Website – old quizzes/midterms, answers to homework (17 groups, 4 sections)

“Online resources.”

“Math resources page with practice quizzes and midterms.”

“Having the answers posted online/website gives us a chance to see if we are working the problems correctly and online examples and tests prepare us for HW and tests.”

   Math Study Center (and CLUE) (11 groups, 4 sections)

Math Study Center!”

Math Study Center is helpful, it allows you to get a sense of where other students are.”

Math Study Center: teacher’s office hours and TAs/tutors.”

Math Study Center, CLUE sessions.”

   Text (2 groups, 2 sections)

“The textbook is very helpful and has wonderful examples and clear explanations.”

 

WORKSHEETS (23 group comments)

   General comments (9 groups, 4 sections)

“Worksheet – Tuesday’s long section.”

“Tuesday worksheets are great, very helpful.”

“Worksheets in quiz section.”

   Groupwork process (7 groups, 4 sections)

“Group interaction with worksheets in section.”

“The worksheets, because we are able to work in groups, which helps us get our questions answered faster.”

“Worksheets are helpful.  (Group thing is effective.)”

“The group work that we do in class helps pool our knowledge, and helps give us new insight on what we are learning in class.”

   Content – practice, walks us through problems (7 groups, 4 sections)

“Worksheets are helpful, they walk you through the problems.”

“Working on worksheets helps prepare us for quizzes and reviews concepts that were taught.  Allows interaction with other students.”

“Worksheets are great in conveying practical applications – good general intro and has repetitive practice of concepts.”

 

INSTRUCTOR CHARACTERISTICS (10 group comments)

   Enthusiastic, cares about our learning (7 groups, 3 sections)

“Having an enthusiastic lecturer, who is really concerned with student understanding.  Professor conveys this by giving opportunities to ask questions every step of the way.”

“Professor is very good in making sure we understand.”

“TAs and professors who take an interest in our learning and comprehension (availability of help, answering questions, very approachable).”

   Other (3 groups, 3 sections)

 

COURSE STRUCTURE (13 group comments)

   Class size – can get questions answered (8 groups, 3 sections)

“Being able to go to lecture with a small class size helps students get questions answered and have the pace adjusted as needed.”

“Small class sizes makes it less intimidating to ask questions and allows the professor to know all the students, in turn making the environment more positive.”

“Smaller classes are good.  Better location for lecture (anyplace rather than Kane).”

   Length of quiz section (3 groups, 3 sections)

“1 and 1/2 hour midterm, helps to do better on the test.”

“1.5 hours quiz section with helpful TA.  (Chance to work with other students.)”

   Other (2 groups, 2 sections)

“Variety: lecture, worksheets, quiz section.”

 

QUIZ SECTION AND TAs (10 group comments)

   Can ask questions about homework (6 groups, 2 sections)

“The TAs come prepared to answer questions and explain the more difficult problems.”

“Asking TA questions on homework during quiz section.”

“Focusing the second quiz section of the week mainly on homework questions that may arise.”

   TA (4 groups, 3 sections)

“Our TA is a very good TA – uses practical examples and has good explanations.”

“Good TA.”

 

HOMEWORK (5 group comments)

   General comments (4 groups, 2 sections)

“Doing the homework.”

“Homework.  Practice is good.”

   Odd problems (1 group, 1 section)

“It’s helpful to be assigned the odd problems (with answers in the back of the book) because it lets you  know if you’re doing the work right.”

 

OTHER (2 group comments)

 

 

B. What is not helping you learn?  What suggestions? (107 group comments)

 

QUIZZES AND TESTS (30 group comments)

   Quizzes/homework link – homework problems don’t prepare us for quizzes/tests (15 groups, 2 sections)

“HW & lectures don’t adequately prepare you for quizzes.  HW & lecture examples aren’t as hard as quizzes.”

“The quizzes seem to be harder than the homework.  (Perhaps, provide practice questions/problems that are similar to the level of questions on quiz/exam.)”

“Book work – it doesn’t help with ‘quizzes’, with actual work (test).”

“We need better prep for quizzes – harder problems in lecture so better prepared for midterm and quiz difficulty.”

   Grading – quiz/HW weight, expectations (11 groups, 3 sections)

“There needs to be more emphasis on homework and less on quizzes – homework is the cornerstone of the class and should be worth more than 5%.  Quizzes should reflect homework, not be more difficult than it.  Quizzes should be worth less than 20%.”

“Homework should be worth more, and quizzes worth less.”

“Quizzes are worth too many points, especially in comparison with tests.”

“None of us have a clear idea of what is expected from us on quizzes.  We all feel like we understand the material, and yet we all are consistently receiving low grades.”

   Use of calculators (3 groups, 3 sections)

“No calculators on quizzes – in elementary, high school, and most other math courses at UW, calculators are not a problem.”

   Other (1 group, 1 section)

“The lack of consistent quizzes every week kind of promotes laziness.  Quizzes help keep us focused.”


LECTURE (24 group comments)

   Explanations – sometimes too quick, steps skipped (10 groups, 4 sections)

“Goes through examples too fast without detail explanation.  Slow down, explain the steps.”

“In lecture, professor often skips the algebra when showing examples, making many of us unable to follow.”

“Assuming we remember trig identities (among other things) from high school.  Professor quickly goes over difficult stuff, skips steps in solving problems.”

“Sometimes lecture is too fast.”

   Examples – need more similar to homework and quizzes/tests (6 groups, 2 sections)

“Lecture (material needs to integrate in quizzes/midterms.)”

“Use examples in class that are similar to the test questions (makes for a better test review).”

“More homework samples in class and lecture would be helpful.”

   Other (9 groups, 3 sections)

 

QUIZ SECTION AND TAs (22 group comments)

   TAs – explanations unclear, not helpful (11 groups, 2 sections)

“TAs who don’t know how to teach the material and not prepared.”

“TA is often unable to be helpful with questions during section.”

“Some of us feel that our TAs aren’t effective teachers.  When you ask a question, you’re usually more confused afterwards.”

   Time and structure (6 groups, 4 sections)

“More time with TA to ask questions.”

“We don’t go over enough problems and not enough questions are answered in quiz section, and our workshop sections.”

“It would be better to switch HW due dates from Tuesday to Thursday because we wouldn’t have overlapping of new HW and old concepts for quiz in the same week.”

   Coordination with lecture (5 groups, 2 sections)

“TA’s explanation is sometimes too different from how professor teaches it.  (Confusing)”

“TAs and quiz section need to more coordinated with homework, lecture, and professor’s comments.  TA’s method should be congruent with professor because it confuses students.”

 

HOMEWORK (14 group comments)

   Content – supplementary problems too hard (7 groups, 2 sections)

“Supplement homework is not taught well, and we have to figure it all out through MSC, or CLUE.”

“Supplemental problems are too hard, i.e. not taught well.”

   Structure – get it back too late, due date (4 groups, 1 section)

“Don’t get homework back until after tests or quizzes.  Makes studying difficult.”

“Suggestion: HW due on Thursday as opposed to Tuesday.”

   Amount/repetition (3 groups, 2 sections)

“Repetitive HW problems out of the book seem kind of pointless.”

“Less busywork problems when you already get the concept.”

 

RESOURCES (11 group comments)

   Website (4 groups, 3 sections)

“More of our professor’s stuff on the materials website.”

“Answers are given for the homework online assignments, but if an explanation (of how to do it) was given it would be much more helpful.”

   Math Study Center (3 groups, 2 sections)

“The Math Study Center is really not a great study area due to the lack of help.  The help there is a very specific problem-to-problem help.  The availability of help is not as it should be for a study center.”

Math Study Center (some TAs).  Some don’t seem to know how to solve a problem, but take time trying to figure them out (to no avail).”

   Textbook (3 groups, 3 sections)

“The book’s explanations and descriptions of problems doesn’t help at all – it seems to just get us more confused about how to solve homework problems.”

“Reading the math book.”

   Other (1 groups, 1 section)

 

WORKSHEETS (4 group comments)

   Not relevant, too long, more time for Q & A (4 groups, 3 sections)

“The worksheets.  Too long and draws the point out.”

“Worksheets don’t tie into previous concepts so presents difficulty.  Working in groups is helpful, but content can be confusing.”

 

OTHER (4 group comments)

“Doing great the way it is.”

“Hour and 20 minute quiz section makes scheduling difficult.”

 

 

C. Other comments

 

In Section C on the worksheet, groups tend to write general comments about the class or comments that reiterate feedback already written in Sections A and B.  In this section, there were a total of 29 group comments, two of which were related to calculus changes.  The two comments are included below.

 

“Sectionals on Tuesdays should not be 80 minutes long.  Only 50.”

“No supplementary readings in course pack – there needs to be.”

 

 

D. Integrated Math Question

 

In all sections of 124, students were asked to indicate on the back of the group worksheet whether or not they had the Integrated Math Curriculum in high school.

 

a)   Question:  Did you have the Integrated Math (I, II, and III) curriculum in high school?

 

Results:  67 students, out of a total of 183 responding, indicated that they had the Integrated Math Curriculum in high school.

 

b)   In addition, individual students were asked to respond to a second question: 

On a scale of 0 to 5 (5 being “very prepared”), indicate how prepared you felt for the trigonometry section at the beginning of Math 124.

 

Results:

 

 

 

How students who DID NOT have Integrated Math rated their preparation

How students who DID have Integrated Math rated their preparation

 

N

 

116

67

 

Mean

 

3.4

3.6

 

Median

 

3

4

 

 


Math 125 Midterm Feedback – Spring 2004

 

 

Feedback gathered during Week 6 in 7 sections taught by 4 instructors

Total number of students participating in feedback process = 327

Total number of groups = 78

 

A. What is helping you learn? (241 group comments)

 

LECTURE (96 group comments)

   Examples – step-by-step, lots, good range, relevant to HW (42 groups, 7 sections)

“Use of basic examples to explain new material, also does problems from the book.”

“In-class examples that worked out in class because they are easy to refer back to.”

“Example questions with solutions.  Shows all steps and explains clearly, repetition of important parts.”

“The numerous examples given in lecture are helpful when it comes time to do homework as well as study for quizzes/tests.”

“Doing easy problems for examples and doing more complicated problems to help us practice.”

“Examples that bring in all material.  Ties everything together.”

“Examples and sample problems help us prepare for quizzes and tests.”

   Review/recap – review of previous lecture, warm-up problems (19 groups, 4 sections)

“It is good that the professor goes over the material from the previous class, and correlates it with the material from the current class.”

“Does recap of previous class … helps students remember what they were learning.”

“How the professor outlines what’s going on before each class and what’s to come in the following sections.”

“Warm-up questions, also helps us refresh our skills, get in math mode.”

“The warm-ups before class lectures are effective in fortifying covered material.”

“Warm-up problems (helps students test and understand what they learned).”

   Explanations – clear, thorough (13 groups, 6 sections)

“The professor explains the material/examples in a way that is easy to understand.”

“Good explanations – clearly explains examples.”

“Wide variety of explanations.  If something isn’t clear, s/he’ll try a new way of explaining it.”

“Clear explanation by the lecturer.”

   Organization/presentation – pace, notes (9 groups, 5 sections)

“The pace at which we take on sections lets us learn concepts and apply them.  Revisiting concepts on occasion.”

“Notes – similar to exams, helps more than the book.”

“Gives time to copy/take notes.”

“Use of visuals (graphs) to explain equations.”

   Doing problems in class (5 groups, 3 sections)

“We like how professor gives us time to try example problems ourselves before s/he solves.”

“The way we can try to work out the examples given first so it’s easier to tell how difficult they are.”

   Other (3 groups, 2 sections)

 

RESOURCES (40 group comments)

   Math Study Center (and CLUE) – (22 groups, 7 sections)

Math Study Center à Open early and lots of help from TAs.  CLUE à open late, familiar people.”

“MSC is a great tool – ability to get help from experienced people and work through problems.”

“Math Study Center/ CLUE – Tutors clarify confusing concepts through one-on-one help.”

“The study center is helpful because we get to work with other students to get problems answered.”

Math Study Center – TAs helpful and enthusiastic.”

   Website – old quizzes/tests, answers (9 groups, 4 sections)

“Online resources – old tests and quizzes help us study.”

“Example midterms & finals, so we know what’s up.”

“Quizzes and old tests online with answer helps study.”

   Textbook (7 groups, 5 sections)

“The textbook is very explanatory.”

“Solutions guide to the book.”

“The textbook is a good way to go back and refer to.”

   Office hours (2 groups, 2 sections)

“Office hours.”


QUIZ SECTION AND TAs (31 group comments)

   TAs – explanations and examples (15 groups, 7 sections)

“TAs who are willing to explain homework problems, not afraid to talk in class.”

“TAs help out a lot.  (HW, clarification, etc.)”

“TA has good examples and inquires about if the students are learning.”

“Section is helpful because our TA is explicit and attentive.  Can focus more on a personal level.”

“Also Math TAs very helpful.  Really nice about explaining and doing problems.”

   Question & answer on homework problems (11 groups, 5 sections)

“Tuesday and Thursday TA sections seem to be helping more because it’s more hands-on and it’s easier to get 1-on-1 help.”

“TA goes over the homework problems before homework is due.”

“TA section, TA goes over hard questions from the HW.”

   Other (5 groups, 5 sections)

 

HOMEWORK (23 group comments)

   Content – challenging, good practice (13 groups, 5 sections)

Homework helps – more difficult so it challenges us & helps us to really know what we are doing.”

“Homework helps understand concepts.”

“Homework problems give good practice for quizzes and midterms.”

   Structure – due date (10 groups, 2 sections)

“Homework due on Thursday instead of Tuesday, giving us more time to spend on it.”

“That HW is due on Thursday allows us to ask questions on Tuesday.”

“Homework and quiz on Thursday – more time to study.”

 

WORKSHEETS (19 group comments)

   Content – step-by-step, preview of upcoming lecture (8 groups, 5 sections)

“The weekly in-class worksheet done on Thursday. Going step-by-step makes it easier to understand overall concept.”

“Worksheet helps by opening door to new unit.  Gets ball rolling.”

“The worksheets and quizzes are designed to show us what we need to work on, and shows us what we know and what needs improvement.”

   General comments (7 groups, 7 sections)

“Worksheets.”

“Worksheets help.  But we want them to be worth something.”

   Group process – working in group, participation (4 groups, #4 sections)

“Quiz section helps.  Teamwork/working with others is good.”

“Participation-based worksheets help the level of understanding.”

 

QUIZZES AND TESTS (15 group comments)

   Quizzes – similar to exams, keeps us on track (8 groups, 6 sections)

“Quizzes, the difficulty of the quizzes are close to the exams’ difficulty, so it helps us to prepare for the exams.”

“Having a weekly quiz keeps us from getting behind.”

“Quizzes are helpful.  Keeps students in check.”

   Expectations/notesheets (4 groups, 2 sections)

“Telling what’s important to focus on and what not to for the quizzes.”

“Notes on midterms and finals; focus more on calculus rather than trig, focus more on concept.”

   Review sessions (3 groups, 2 sections)

“Review sessions before midterms with TA are very helpful.”

 

INSTRUCTOR CHARACTERISTICS (8 group comments)

   Open to questions, understanding (4 groups, 2 sections)

“Fair and understanding on HW due dates and realizes when material is difficult for students.”

“Professor gives a lot of help and answers questions – is approachable.”

   Class atmosphere (4 groups, 2 sections)

“Lectures – laid-back, humorous.”

 

COURSE STRUCTURE (8 group comments)

   Class size/interaction– answering questions in class (4 groups, 2 sections)

“Small lecture/smaller classes – more personal learning experience, questions answered better.”

“Answering questions about examples, helping everyone to understand.”


   Longer quiz section (3 groups, 2 sections)

“Longer quiz sections: more time on midterms, more time for worksheets, reviewing homework.”

   Homework (1 group, 1 section)

“It’s helpful that the homework is the same for each 125 class.”

 

OTHER (1 group comment)

 

 

B. What is not helping you learn?  What suggestions? (194 group comments)

 

LECTURE (58 group comments)

   Organization/presentation – pace, use of overhead, handwriting (24 groups, 6 sections)

“Prof writes too fast – just goes over material too quickly – go slower and go over material in greater detail.  Doesn’t finish examples and skips steps.”

“In lecture the professor seems to go too fast in class and takes frequent shortcuts leaving students behind and lost.”

“Lectures, at time, pace is too fast, difficult to keep up.”

“Moves along quickly when using the overhead, not enough time to take down notes.  Small handwriting.”

“Writing is a little hard to read at times.”

   Explanations – sometimes skips steps, doesn’t finish, more review/explanation, interruptions (17 groups, 7 sections)

“Professor goes way too fast, needs to go slower, needs to go over the problem step-by-step, because some people are uncomfortable saying they need to do all the steps.”

“Not evaluating examples all the way – assuming we are ‘experts’ at evaluating the functions à would like to have problems worked all the way through.”

“Lecture style: not finishing examples, not enough explanations of examples.”

“More review is need for ‘common knowledge’ (background facts, identities, needed equations).  Ex: the needed identities should be pointed out.  Introduction to what the needed equations are good for.”

“Please don’t allow interruptions while solving a problem because it disrupts our flow of thought.  Please answer questions at the end of the problem.  :)”

   Examples – easier than HW/tests, more non-book examples (11 groups, 6 sections)

“The examples are too simple, not reflective of questions that will be on midterms or finals.  They don’t provide assistance with homework.  Do problems that are more reflective of the ones we have on h/w.”

“More difficult and complex examples in class.  (Lack of examples.)”

“Balance out complexity so lecture prepares us for requirements.”

“Does the same examples in the book.  Choose different examples that show us things that aren’t explained in the text.”

Not having a warm-up problem – A warm-up problem would be helpful at the beginning of lecture so we could have more of an idea of how we are understanding material.  (More problems for us to do.)”

   Other (6 groups, 5 sections)

 

HOMEWORK (34 group comments)

   Even numbered problems – need answers (9 groups, 4 sections)

“Provide even-problem answers so we can make sure we are doing the problems correctly. Otherwise, we may be learning incorrect methods.”

Even-numbered problems – not being able to look at the answers does not allow you to check work or know if you are doing the problem correctly.”

“If more answers were given for the homework problems, not just the odd answers.  Sometimes TAs can’t get through all the problems requested.”

   Non-book problems – too hard, not like quizzes/tests (9 groups, 5 sections)

“Extra homework problems (not book problems) can be incredibly confusing.”

“The supplemental problems on the homework each week – they are usually complex and harder than what we learn in class.”

“Overly difficult homework problems that we can’t do and the TAs just end up solving for us.”

“Supplemental problems don’t apply to quizzes and tests à therefore, it seems kinda useless.”

   Amount (6 groups, 3 sections)

“Homework is excessive (less or no HW around midterm, would have liked to study more). (5/5)”

Homework too long to focus on understanding topics.”

   Grading (6 groups, 4 sections)

“The homework grading should be over all problems not just the really hard selected ones.”

“The homework grading is unfair that if we get one problem wrong, we get marked off 1/3 of the grade.”

“Grade more on completion and effort than is being done.  Give more credit for work that has obviously been worked hard on (less on correct answer).”

   Structure (4 groups, 4 sections)

“It would be nice for homework to be due on Thursday, rather than Tuesday, at the end of class, after we have gone through some problems that were difficult.”

“To turn HW on Thursday would be better, can’t use it to study for midterms, etc.”

 

WORKSHEETS (33 group comments)

   Content – not relevant, timing, difficulty (11 groups, 6 sections)

“Worksheets are somewhat a waste of time in some cases because they don’t always seem relevant to what’s going on.”

“Worksheets in section (not very relevant to class; not turned in = not taken seriously).”

“Worksheets do not coincide with lecture, given usually a week out of date.  Do not significantly help to further learning of material.”

“Worksheets never really aid our learning.  They’re too easy and lag behind lecture.”

   Process – not sure of correct answers, not really working in groups, need explanation (11 groups, 6 sections)

“Worksheets; because TA doesn’t stress the importance of worksheets.”

“Worksheets: difficult to know if getting things right.  We’d rather go have that time for homework questions.”

“Worksheets aren’t helpful because either we don’t finish, or don’t know if our answers are correct.”

“Worksheets need to be worth points.  Gives us drive to do them.”

“Groups for worksheets don’t work – hardly anybody ever works in groups anyway.”

   Use of time – rather have Q & A, feels like wasted time (5 groups, 4 sections)

“Worksheets, because it does not cover the entire chapter and it is time-consuming.  We rather go over homework problems instead.”

“Worksheet time feels like wasted time.  They don’t ‘bring home’ the concepts.”

“Worksheets take up too much time that could be spent learning, doing homework examples.”

   General comments (6 groups, 4 sections)

“The worksheets are not helpful.”

 

QUIZZES/TESTS AND GRADING (31 group comments)

   Quizzes and tests – too hard, more difficult than what’s covered in class, not enough time (16 groups, 5 sections)

“Unexpected questions on quizzes; suggestion: easier, more straightforward quizzes.”

“Quizzes: have not helped.  Difficulty level too high.”

“Midterm not consistent with homework/lecture/quiz problems.”

“Level of complexity is much higher in homework and tests and quizzes than is covered in class.”

“Quizzes and midterms are too lengthy. We cannot complete them in the amount of time, and feel rushed.”

   Grading – need feedback, no curve (8 groups, 3 sections)

“Need feedback on quizzes.”

“Grading – not curved – helpful?  No.”

   Review sessions and expectations (4 groups, 3 sections)

“Hold review sessions for midterms/final.”

“Be much more specific as to what we should expect on midterms à + quizzes.”

   Calculators and notesheets (3 groups, 2 sections)

“No calculator or notes on quizzes is hard; quizzes become more of testing memorization of antiderivatives and trig rather than how much we understand the calculus aspect of class.”

 

QUIZ SECTIONS AND TAs (21 group comments)

   TAs – explanations, organization (9 groups, 5 sections)

“TAs should be more proactive.  When students don’t ask questions, things don’t get covered.”

“Our TA over-explains some concepts (i.e.: derivatives), but doesn’t explain the harder concepts as well.”

“Quiz sections.  TA isn’t very thorough when helping with homework problems, rushes through things.”

“TAs who write out solutions without explaining in detail.  Instructor can train TAs to his/her explaining style.  (Filling the board with abstract mathematics.)”

   Structure – homework due day/time (7 groups, 4 sections)

“Homework being due on Tuesday is in some ways unhelpful because it makes it seem like there’s not much time to finish the problems thoroughly.”

“Thursday isn’t good how everything is due on this day.  For example, quiz, homework, worksheets.”

“Quiz, homework due on Thursday instead of Tuesday – more time to work on homework before asking for help.”

   More time for homework questions (4 groups, 3 sections)

“Not discussing enough HW problems.”

“HW should be due on Thursday so there is time to ask TA.”

   Other (1 group, 1 section)

 

RESOURCES (9 group comments)

   Website – need more solutions (6 groups, 3 sections)

“More practice exams with solutions.”

“Need more midterm solutions – past midterms are useless unless solutions are posted.”

“Warm-ups on internet, to have examples for exams.”

   Textbook (2 groups, 1 section)

“The textbook isn’t a good source of help.  Most of us have had a better textbook that explains topics a lot more thoroughly.”

   Office hours (1 group, 1 section)

“Bad office hours!  During other classes.”

 

OTHER (7 group comments)

 

 

C. Other comments

 

In Section C on the worksheet, groups tend to write general comments about the class or comments that reiterate feedback already written in Sections A and B.  In this section, there were a total of forty group comments, three of which were related to calculus changes.  The three comments are included below.

 

“The Math classes are run very systematically and our professor is a very enthusiastic, good teacher.”

“We think there really isn’t anything that is not helping us learn.  Math department is doing a good job.”

“Very good worksheets.”