Summary of Midterm Student Feedback

MATH 124 and 125

Spring 2002

 

 

           This report presents the student perceptions gathered in the midterm feedback sessions facilitated for the Department of Mathematics by staff from the Center for Instructional Development and Research in April and May, 2002.  The feedback was gathered in MATH 124 and 125, in a total of 11 sections.

 

           Midterm Feedback Session Process:  In each feedback session, students first met in small groups to discuss and record responses to the questions on the feedback worksheet (see attached).  Students then discussed their responses to Questions A and B (“What’s helping you learn?”;  “What’s not helping you learn?” and “What suggestions do you have?”) with the facilitator in the large group.  Notes were taken on the overhead during the large group discussion.  Question C was not discussed in the large group.

 

           Write-up Process:  The feedback from each section was first compiled, categorized, and written up in an individual report for the instructor.  Each report was then presented to the instructor and strategies for responding to the feedback were discussed.

 

           Summary Report:  For the summary report, all feedback from each class (the four sections of MATH 124 and the seven sections of MATH 125) was compiled, categorized and summarized.  The final summary report for each class lists the main themes that emerged from the data.  The number of groups commenting on each topic is included, and representative comments from the group worksheets are provided.  Reference to individual instructors is omitted.

 


Math 124 Midterm Feedback -- Spring 2002

 

Feedback gathered during Week 5 in 4 sections taught by 3 instructors

Total number of students participating in feedback process = 208

Total number of groups = 50

 

A. What is helping you learn?

 

LECTURE (4 sections)

   Examples and explanations (22 groups, 4 sections)

“The problems worked out on the overhead are good, and s/he goes through them slowly (which is helpful).”

“Class (lectures) – s/he gives lots of example problems so that we can apply them to homework.”

“Overall the explanations and ‘translations’ make the material much easier to understand and comprehend.”

“Examples of problems in lecture.  Having students work on them first before discussing answers.”

   Size (11 groups, 4 sections)

“Small class size is wonderful, it allows much better student/teacher interaction and actually allows the student to be involved in class.”

“Lecture class isn’t so big, more questions answered.”

“Student questions help direct the learning to the trouble spots.”

   Organization/presentation (4 groups, 3 sections)

“The use of two overheads gives enough time to write all examples.”

“Much better paced than 120 class.  Actually have time to learn material.”

 

RESOURCES (4 sections)

   Math Study Center and office hours (19 groups, 4 sections)

“Having the Math Study Center as a resource.”

“Availability and helpfulness of TA and instructor through office hours, MSC, and email.”

“TA office hours.”

   Website (8 groups, 3 sections)

“Archived tests and quizzes online, which allows extra practice.”

“Practice tests being posted.  Gives a good idea of what to expect.”

“The class webpage because it supplies us with information such as homework assignments.  The general math website is also nice because it outlines the entire quarter.”

   Textbook (2 groups, 1 section)

“Book is good.  Helps explain/clarify what we’ve learned in more depth.”

 

HOMEWORK AND TESTS (4 sections)

   Homework (10 groups, 4 sections)

“Homework and weekly activities help us understand the concepts learned in lecture.”

“Having homework that is due every week so we’re forced to review every week.”

“Homework  -- straightforward, related to the quiz.”

   Homework/quiz system (8 groups, 1 section)

“Good that no homework is due – and homework is incorporated on the quiz.”

“Homework quizzes makes me more apt to ask questions on tough problems.”

“The homework process and homework quizzes – creative way to get students to do the homework.”

   Quizzes (5 groups, 3 sections)

“Weekly quizzes.”

“Having a quiz every week is good because it forces us to keep up.  and the quiz is based off the homework.”

   Supplementary problems (2 groups, 2 sections)

“Supplementary problems on web.”

“Homework volume seems fair and helpful.  Supplements help convey class concepts well.”

 

QUIZ SECTION AND TAs (4 sections)

   TAs enthusiastic, willing to help, available (11 groups, 4 sections)

“TA’s willingness to help and knowing their stuff.”

“Quiz and study section – good extra help from TA.”

“The review before quizzes that the TA goes through.”

   Going over homework, Q & A (7 groups, 3 sections)

“Section: giving time to ask questions.”

“Sections – gives us a chance to go over the homework and ask questions.”

“TA section where main points of lecture are covered and questions about homework are answered.”

   Length/structure (6 groups, 2 sections)

“Extended class on Tuesdays (1 hr. 30 min.) – chance to ask TAs questions.”

“The longer class period for doing worksheets.  This allows students to not rush and get help in their weaker areas.”

“The hour and a half for the midterm.”

 

WORKSHEETS (4 sections)

   Good practice, help understanding (13 groups, 4 sections)

“The worksheets are more applied problems.  You have to understand concepts to successfully complete them.”

“The worksheets are a good way to practice.”

“The activity worksheets in section and example problems.  The real life application helps people to remember the concept.”

   Working in groups (8 groups, 3 sections)

“Worksheets:  group work allows for the generation of ideas without being given an immediate answer.”

“Worksheets – allows us to learn from our classmates, helps teach each other.”

“The group worksheets in quiz section allow discussion and individual help from the TA.”

 

PROFESSOR CHARACTERISTICS (2 sections)

   Energy/enthusiasm (9 groups, 2 sections)

“Enthusiasm is very contagious! J

“The professor’s energetic attitude allows us to learn better.”

“The enthusiasm and passion of the professor and TA.”

   Cares (5 groups, 2 sections)

“Professor makes an effort to learn everyone’s names and to make sure everyone is keeping up in class.”

“Student profiles were great.  It helped to make the student – prof relationship not so impersonal.  MORE TEACHERS SHOULD FOLLOW THIS METHOD.”

“The teacher is not intimidating so it’s easy to ask questions.”

 

 

B. What is not helping you learn?  What suggestions?

 

LECTURE (4 sections)

   Presentation/organization (12 groups, 4 sections)

“More concise explanations – more to the point.”

“Professor’s lectures aren’t outlined.  S/he should state which sections in the book s/he is explaining so the students can go directly to the book for more help.”

“Unorganized, explain how to use equations more specifically in examples.”

“Sometimes s/he has a tendency to rush to get to a certain point and so glosses over some explanations.”

   Interaction (10 groups, 2 sections)

“More class interaction – like ask the class questions instead of just lecturing.”

“Lecture is not interactive at all.”

   More examples and examples of harder application problems (9 groups, 2 sections)

“The examples you provide are too simple.  You do three or four examples each class, all of which could be found in the book.  Do the application problems!”

“Not teaching us application concepts.  It’s difficult to recognize when to use certain applications on the homework and the tests.”

“Show more homework problems in class rather than spending an entire period embellishing on one problems.”

 

QUIZ SECTION AND TAs (4 sections)

   Scheduling and location (9 groups, 2 sections)

“The one hour 20 minute section on Tuesday – makes scheduling difficult and we don’t gain anything from the extra thirty minutes.”

“We don’t like the fact that Tuesdays and Thursdays have different locations.”

“Need large desks in classrooms (for section) to do tests/quizzes on.  No more small blue desks or tiny rooms.”


   TAs (7 groups, 4 sections)

“Some TAs are not clarifying questions for students.  Partly because they do not attend the lecture.”

“TAs should be more trained in breaking problems down to our level.”

   Content/use of time (6 groups, 4 sections)

“I would like to do more work in Thursday’s quiz section.”

“Go over more HW and supplementary problems instead of worksheet.”

“TA’s section: we hate going to section.  We work with the same groups every week.  Some groups have one person that does all the work.  Also, we have to stay until everyone is done with the quiz … which is pointless.  Quiz section should be devoted to answering questions.”

“Quiz section is sometimes a waste of time.”

   Inconsistency (3 groups, 2 sections)

“Ensure that grading remains consistent between all TAs and other evaluators.”

“When TAs show a different way to do problems, it becomes confusing.”

“My TA does things differently than others which is annoying.  He makes us turn in homework and then we go over it.  We should go over it while it’s in front of us.”

 

TESTS AND QUIZZES (4 sections)

   Test ß à lecture/homework link (8 groups, 4 sections)

“Professor doesn’t ask questions on the tests that are like the book questions, which are where our homework comes from.”

“The quizzes should be based on the concepts and work and homework that we’ve done that week.”

“Final is collective.  Fairness?”

   Quizzes (4 groups, 3 sections)

“Quizzes.”

“Go over quizzes on regular basis.”

   Grading (4 groups, 3 sections)

“Graders picky about answers.”

“The graders need to be on track and look closer at each problem that they’re grading.”

   Review (4 groups, 2 sections)

“A more complete review sheet for the test would be helpful, instead of just a topic list.”

“The practice midterm should reflect the actual midterm in terms of difficulty and material.”

 

WORKSHEETS (3 sections)

   Not relevant (8 groups, 3 sections)

“Worksheets are irrelevant – they are hard and different than homework – but working is groups is good.”

“Worksheet are not helpful.  For example, the Newton’s method, we don’t really use it.”

“It would help if the Prof talked about the worksheets we do in section the day before and the day after.  Give us an intro to them and review the next lecture.”

   Too long (4 groups, 1 section)

“If the activity worksheet was just a little shorter.  It is difficult to get through all the problems in the time given unless it is printed out the night before and begun then.  The problems themselves are great, they teach well, but the length could be abridged.”

“Worksheets/activities too long or complicated to complete in time allotted.  Most people do the work the night before if they actually want to finish.”

   Depends on group (2 groups, 2 sections)

“Group worksheets – better if it was done individually.”

“The activities (Tuesdays) need to be structured differently.  As it stands now there is not enough cooperative effort overall and the point of individual assignments can be lost on students.  Last week’s activity is a prime example.”

 

HOMEWORK (4 sections)

   Supplementary problems not relevant and too time-consuming (10 groups, 4 sections)

“Supplementary problems don’t relate to chapter.”

“The homework is too time-consuming and the supplemental problems take more time than they are useful.”

“Everything is fine except supplementary problems for homework.  Textbook problems work fine by themselves.”

   Solutions (4 groups, 3 sections)

“More answers for supp. problems.”

“Sup à need answers and quizzes.”

 

RESOURCES (4 sections)

   Website (8 groups, 3 sections)

“We would like to be able to go to one website for the homework problems and due dates.”

“It would be nice if the professor’s website (the one the homework is correct on) would be the same as what’s on the department website.”

“Past exams do not have solutions to them.  Would help to be able to check our answers.”

   Math Study Center (2 groups, 2 sections)

“MSC has like two or three tutors throughout the night and it takes all night to answer two questions.”

“Math Study Center can be too crowded.”

 

 

C. Other comments related to calculus changes

 

In Section C on the worksheet groups tend to write general comments or comments that reiterate feedback written in Sections A and B.  Those comments related to calculus changes are included below.

 

   Quiz sections/TAs

“The long period on Tuesday is really inconvenient and makes it hard to sign up for other classes.”

“Tuesday section (and Thursday section for that matter) should not be required to be so long.  If we need the added time to learn material, then the extra time is great.  But if we are just sitting there, coming up with problems to fill the hour or hour and a half, then it is a waste of time.”

“Longer period (Tuesday quiz section ) is really helpful.  We can go over lectures and do problems.”

“Hour and a half section messes up the schedule.  Pretty  good class.”

   Supplementary problems

“Find a textbook that doesn’t require supplementary problems to explain all the concepts.”

“Please do examples like the supplement problems!!!”

   Resources

“Figuring out what HW is due at what time is really important.  I am still in the process of trying to figure out when HW is due.”

 

 


Math 125 Midterm Feedback -- Spring 2002

 

 

Feedback gathered during Week 6 in 7 sections taught by 5 instructors

Total number of students participating in feedback process =  343

Total number of groups = 86

 

 

A.    What is helping you learn?

 

LECTURE (7 sections)

   Examples – lots, step-by-step, shows process (59 groups, 7 sections)

“Seeing a lot of examples, done by instructors in lecture and sections.”

Examples in lecture – they show you the process and give us formulas.”

“Professor uses lots of examples in lecture.  This helps us deal with all types of problems that arise when doing homework.”

“Professor’s lectures  -- lots of examples and background (what’s going on in the big picture [brackets]).”

“Provides examples and goes through it step-by-step.”

“Examples in lecture that pertain to homework, but not from the homework.”

“In depth, step by step examples help you understand.”

“Going over problems on the overhead; very logical step-by-step problem solving skills presented.”

“Organized, sequential of examples and topics covered.  Techniques and tricks to solve problems.”

   Explanations – clear, detailed (23 groups, 7 sections)

“Clear about explaining things.”

“Explanations are concise, and have good amount of time for review session.”

“Good organization from teacher, explanation..”

“Alternate methods of problem solving given in lecture.”

“Providing an order of operations for approaching different kinds of problems.”

“Reviews during lecture (beginning).”

“Daily review and review guide for midterm were helpful.”

“Review and repetition from previous lecture / quiz section.”

   Presentation/organization – notes, pace (17 groups, 4 sections)

“Thorough and helpful notes; consistent with book.”

“Different color pens to differ things in problems”

“The notes written on the overhead really help our understanding of the material.”

“Using both overheads and leaving examples up long enough to copy it down.”

“S/he doesn’t rush through examples.”

   Connection to quizzes/tests/homework – review, common mistakes (9 groups, 2 sections)

“Timely lectures, follows homework nicely.”

“It is also helpful when s/he provides material that is to be covered in quizzes or midterms.”

“The review and common mistakes are very helpful to go over every day.  Also, the problems from old finals are extremely helpful.”

 

WORKSHEETS (7 sections)

   Helpful (14 groups, 5 sections)

“Reinforcement of the worksheets.”

“Worksheets in quiz sections.”

“Worksheets are helpful this quarter.”

   Relevant (12 groups, 6 sections)

“Relevant worksheets – the information/concepts are immediately applicable.”

“Worksheets are better than they were in 124.”

“Worksheets are more relevant and consistent with lectures.”

“The worksheets seem to better fit what we’re learning in lecture.”

“Worksheets are good this quarter.  Relevant this quarter.”

   Clear, step-by-step (4 groups, 5 sections)

“Worksheets are helpful.  Step-by-step process makes it easier to ‘understand’ the material.”

“Worksheets (since they walk us through the steps).”

   Working in groups (4 groups, 4 sections)

“Being able to talk to others, work in groups.”

“Groupwork – allows us to discuss/collaborate ideas on how to solve problems.”

 

QUIZ SECTION AND TAs (7 sections)

   TA – approachable, knowledgeable (10 groups, 6 sections)

“Good TA  – approachable.”

“TA’s understanding of material.”

“The TA is very knowledgeable and helpful.”

   Going over homework questions, review before quiz (9 groups, 4 sections)

“Going over homework in quiz section before you turn it in.”

“Quiz section – being able to ask questions before quiz, quizzes test knowledge, worksheets.”

“Quiz section – able to assess exactly what you’ve learned.”

“Reviewing before the quizzes (TAs).”

   Structure – length, size (4 groups, 2 sections)

“Long quiz sections and step by step worksheets.”

“Smaller sections with the TA are helpful because we can ask questions.”

“Extended exam times are very useful and helpful.”

 

RESOURCES (7 sections)

   Math Study Center and office hours (14 groups, 7 sections)

Math Study Center – TAs give one on one help, other students help.”

“Math Study Center, outside resources.”

“Math Study Center – I do all my homework there.”

“Many office hours available.”

   Textbook (9 groups, 4 sections)

“Reading book before attending lectures.”

The book --  they have descriptions and proofs.”

“The solutions manual.”

“The book; explanations and examples given.”

   Handouts, emails and website (8 groups, 3 sections)

“The volumes worksheet you gave us to review for the midterm.  More handouts like that (problems with step by step solutions) would be nice.”

“Handouts provided by Prof. and TA.”

“Email.”

“Old midterms/finals online à practice for tests.”

“Having the even answers for homework online and having notesheet for exams.”

 

HOMEWORK and TESTS (7 sections)

   Amount, good practice (18 groups, 7 sections)

“Homework problems.”

“Homework à Good for outside-of-class practice.”

“Large number of practice problems.”

“Amount of homework and kinds of problems are helpful.  No more supp packet.”

“The more acceptable amount of homework helps.  HW is more varied, covers a little bit of everything.”

“Expectations are clear.  Workload is more realistic (no supplementary problems).”

   Relationship between homework and quizzes/tests (14 groups, 5 sections)

“Homework – prepares well for test.”

“Homework offers good practice for exams.”

“For the most part, quizzes and homework do correspond well.  Worksheets also cover relevant material.”

“We like how quiz questions and exams questions come off of either HW, worksheets, or class examples.  If you do those you’ll do well on tests.”

“Quizzes every week à keeps us from falling behind.”

“Quizzes are good because it goes over material / homework for the week.”

   Page of notes for tests (5 groups, 4 sections)

“The idea of taking one sheet of notes for the exams.”

“Page of notes!!!”

“Thanks for letting us use notes on the test.”

   Review sheets, clear expectations (5 groups, 5 sections)

“Review sheets for exams.”

“The review sessions (before midterms).”

“Clear expectations of what we need to know.”

 


INSTRUCTOR CHARACTERISTICS (6 sections)

   Enthusiasm/attitude, humor (9 groups, 6 sections)

“S/he is enthusiastic and energetic.”

“Positive attitude and jovial-ness.”

“Daily jokes – adds humor to class, loosens everyone up.”

   Approachable (8 groups,4 sections)

“Receptive to questions.”

“Approachable.”

“Knows students by name.”

 

 

B.    What is not helping?  What suggestions?

 

LECTURE (7 sections)

   Examples – do more difficult examples (26 groups, 6 sections)

“Examples aren’t from a wide range.  They are all similar so when we do homework there are examples we haven’t seen.”

“Examples given in class are too easy.  Only does basics.  Need more harder ones.”

“Some examples are too simple, and similar problems are repeated, a bigger variety would be helpful.”

“The examples tend to reflect the easier problems and not the harder problems we are tested on.”

“Using harder problems as examples in class when teaching.  The problems s/he poses during class aren’t very helpful when trying to solve harder problems.  In the future, post problems that the book might not cover that is difficult.”

“Examples in class difficulty level is too low.  Make in-class problems harder.  Need variety of examples using the concept learned.”

“More difficult examples during lectures -- ‘like’ homework.  First easy question and jump into difficult question.  Ones that we can’t figure out no our own.”

   Pace – goes through material quickly (16 groups, 6 sections)

Speed of examples – it’s too quick to write and listen.  (Slow down.)”

“Sometimes instructor goes too fast without explaining thoroughly.  Separate material into two days.”

“Professor sometimes rushes through concepts without checking for understanding.”

“It’s difficult sometimes to ask questions because professor moves too quickly.”

“Class moves very fast – easy to fall behind.”

   Organization/presentation (13 groups, 4 sections)

“Professor should be more organized and concentrated on what s/he is writing (erases, makes mistakes).”

“More enthusiasm from professor.”

“The room structure – a lot of times we can’t see what s/he’s writing on the overhead.  They need to move the screen higher up.”

   Skipping steps, unfinished examples (8 groups, 2 sections)

“Speeding through material while skipping steps.”

“Instructor shouldn’t skip steps in explanation.  Needs to explain examples better.”

“Not fully completing examples in class  -- don’t suppose we know how to finish.  Some steps still escape us.”

“Sometimes s/he skips steps in examples and assumes that we can follow along, when we might not totally comprehend what he did.”

   Explanations --  sometimes unclear (9 groups, 3 sections)

“Doesn’t explain why or how.”

“More explanation of questions asked.”

 

TESTS AND QUIZZES (7 sections)

   Relationship: tests and homework/lecture – midterm harder than homework/lecture examples (17 groups, 6 sections)

“Problems on test should be reflective of homework.”

“The content on quizzes does not coincide with homework.”

“Some of the HW problems do not relate to what we are quizzed on.”

“Quizzes are not reflective of tests (they are easier).  Make them equal difficulty.”

   Quizzes/midterm long, not enough time (10 groups, 6 sections)

“Not enough time to complete midterm – or – we should have taken it in the longer quiz section.”

“The midterm was too long and too hard for the 50 minutes we had to take it in.”

“Very tough, long quizzes.”

“The quizzes are too long.  It is hard to do each problem completely when there is a time limit.”


   Grading – only one midterm (3 groups, 2 sections)

“A lot covered on midterm, too much of our grade weighed on one test.”

“Please have two midterms – breaks up material more and can go more in-depth on concepts.”

 

HOMEWORK (5 sections)

   Grading – weight, only three graded (12 groups, 5 sections)

TA’s grading – too harsh, too picky , no helpful comments.  (Train TAs, clearly stated grading requirements.)”

“Homework worth too much of grade – shouldn’t be worth that much.”

“Grading of HW is not helpful and not encouraging – i.e. 0/6 even if HW is all done.  Should be graded on completeness.”

“The way homework is graded is detrimental in that you are doing the HW to learn, and thus are likely to make mistakes.  HW should be graded on completeness.”

   Feedback/solutions – more odd problems to check work (8 groups, 4 sections)

“More odd problems to check work.  Answers on line (want answers to know if we are solving problems correctly).”

“Having all the homework problems even does not help us learn.  When we are first learning, it is beneficial to check answers instead of blindly going forward.”

   Type of problems (6 groups, 4 sections)

“The homework is a lot of number crunching, not theory application.  We should have the supplementary problems included in HW.”

“Not enough basic homework problems assigned to get us comfortable with the material.”

 

QUIZ SECTION AND TAs (6 sections)

   TAs – explanations unclear, hard to understand (13 groups, 3 sections)

“The TA is not very instructive. ”

“TA isn’t very good – confusing, doesn’t explain well.”

“Our TA has an incredibly thick accent and is very hard to understand.  This makes it difficult to get our questions answered.”

“Cannot comprehend TA.  TA cannot comprehend us.”

   Use of time – more time to ask questions (10 groups, 3 sections)

“Tuesday quiz section – no help on homework, maybe make Tuesdays devoted to homework help.”

“Need more time in quiz section to go over homework questions for certain questions that students struggle with.”

“Not enough opportunity to ask about homework questions.”

“Better use of Tu section.  Worksheet doesn’t take whole time, maybe a review of the past week or some sort of review.”

“90-minute quiz sections – maybe better usage would improve the quality of sections.”

   TA ß à professor communication (6 groups, 4 sections)

“Our TA does not follow teaching style of professor.”

“More interaction between the TA and professor, correlation of info.”

“Professor and TA use different methods in solving problems, gets confusing.”

 

WORKSHEETS (6 sections)

   Not relevant (7 groups, 5 sections)

“About half the worksheets don’t seem to be relevant to what’s happening in class.  Make worksheets more relevant to class topics (like this week’s worksheet – 5/7/02)”

“The worksheets seem pointless.  We never see the problems again.  The time would be much better spent reviewing lectures and asking questions.”

“Worksheets – too long, doesn’t apply.”

   Use of time (5 groups, 3 sections)

“Tuesday quiz section more focused on homework vs. worksheet.”

“Rather go over HW instead of worksheets.”

“Quiz section worksheets; time should be spent on homework questions.”

   General comments (4 groups, 3 sections)

“TA section / worksheets…. Tuesdays don’t help.  TAs don’t seem to help.”

“Doing worksheets in section.”

   Grading/feedback (3 groups, 3 sections)

“How worksheets are required as points.”

“Discuss solutions to worksheets after completion.”

 


RESOURCES (4 sections)

   Math Study Center (3 groups, 2 sections)

“MSC, tutors aren’t there long enough for help because too many people.”

“Procedures followed in Math Study Center regarding the number of questions that may be asked.”

“Sometimes not enough TAs at Study Center.  You have to wait a long time to get a question answered!”

   Textbook (2 groups, 1 section)

“The textbook itself.”

“Book – bizarre, complicated questions.”

 

 

C. Other comments related to calculus changes

 

In Section C on the worksheet, groups tend to write general comments or comments that reiterate feedback written in Sections A and B.  There were a total of 48 group comments in this section.  Those comments related to calculus changes are included below.

 

   Homework

“We are really happy about no supplementary.”

“Thank you for getting rid of supplementary problems!!”

“Glad that they’ve done away with supplementary problems.”

“Wonderful decision to get rid of supplementary problems.”

   Class Structure

“Have another lecture class rather than two quiz sections.  Maybe do two sections a week instead of three sections a week (of text chapters) – could also increase the frequency of homework to compensate.”

“We like having the 120 minute period for tests.”

“Our group feels that the extra time given does not positively impact our learning.  Also, it is difficult to understand TAs which poses problems during section lectures.”

 

 

D.   Homework:

 

On the back of the worksheet for 125, groups were asked to respond to two questions about homework.

 

Responses to Part A:  Are there enough drill problems for you to learn the basic skills?

 

Yes (73 groups)

Yes – plenty, good range of difficulty, and enough examples in class (60 groups)

“Yes.  There are enough, which is a lot, but that is the practice that we really need.”

“Yes.  It is helpful to be able to practice each skill before having to apply them to a difficult problem.”

“Yes.  Better than last quarter – plenty.”

“Yes.  There is a good range of difficulty.”

“Yes.  seems like there are enough, but if you feel like you don’t know it well enough, there are more you can do.”

“Yes.  After doing homework, we know the basic concepts.”

“Yes.  The amount of work assigned is just the right amount without making the concepts confusing.”

“Yes.  Homework is sufficient and long enough.  Takes a lot of time.”

“Yes.  There are a variety of the types of problems to use different skills.”

“Yes.  The lectures give us plenty of simple questions that help us learn the basics.”

Yes – sometimes more than enough (6 groups)

“Yes.  Sometimes too many, but we like NO supplementary problems.”

“Yes.  Too many, only need like one or two examples of each type of problem.”

“Yes.  If you attempt all of the homework.  There aren’t enough in-class problems.”

Yes, but … – need to check answers, need more examples in class (7 groups)

“Yes.  Give less even problems so we can check answers.”

“Yes.  The first part of each lesson is very helpful.  It is often inconvenient when we can’t check answers to even problems.”

 

Yes and no (4 groups)

“Yes and no.  But they aren’t hard enough. Maybe incorporate some of the more difficult problems.”

 


No (9 groups)

No –  not enough (9 groups)

“No.  Homework would be better with more drill problems, less story problems.”

“No.  The problems provided in the HW only assist the student in strengthening the understanding of a concept, not grasping it.  You need to put more basic problems.”

“No.  We need to do more drill problems on the integration, and not so many higher thinking problems.”

“No.  Need more easy problems and less hard.”

“No.  More problems from the start of the exercise section instead of doing a few and jumping into the hard ones.”

 

Responses to Part B:  Are there enough challenging problems for you to develop your problem solving skills?

 

Yes (69 groups)

Yes – plenty, good range of difficulty (44 groups)

“Yes.  A few challenging problems in each homework is good practice.”

“Yes.  Some of the questions are pretty hard and force us to think conceptually.”

“Yes.  The last problems of each section are quite challenging and promotes thorough understanding of material.”

“Yes.  They are very hard!”

“Yes.  The end book problems are difficult.”

“Yes.  The problems include a variety of questions from simple to difficult and application, problem-solving.” 

“Yes.  The homework is fair.  It has easy problems and challenging problems.”

Yes, but – need solutions or discussion in lecture, need more difficult examples in class (15 groups)

“Yes.  But not helpful if there aren’t any solutions so we aren’t sure whether we did them right.”

“Yes.  It would be nice to have the professor help us get them started and let us work through them then.” 

“Yes.  Would appreciate more application examples in class.”

“Yes.  Too many, challenging problems are not covered.  Not really sure if you are doing it right.”

Yes – maybe too many, often they’re too challenging (10 groups)

“Yes.  Sometimes the problems involve methods that we haven’t learned yet and it is rather difficult and frustrating to try and apply concepts we have not learned.”

“Yes.  And sometimes, they are too challenging.”

“Yes.  There may be too many problems on the homework.”

“Yes.  There are more than enough.  Need more moderate problems between easy and hard.”

Yes – glad there are no supplementary problems (3 groups)

“Yes.  Usually feel prepared for the quiz.  Improvement: no more supplementary problems is a plus!!”

“I think we’re better off without supplementary problems.  Too complicated and wasted our time because we never used those questions in any of our tests.  Maybe make a dozen optional questions on the webpage, with increasing difficulty.”

 

Yes and no (1 group)

“Yes (2 people).  No (3 people).”

 

No (10 groups)

No –  not enough (6 groups)

“No.  We encounter harder problems on the homework, and we are not proficient enough with the concepts to know more than the basic skills.”

“No.  Not enough problems combining all different skills together.”

No –  need more challenging problems in lecture (4 groups)

“No.  It’s not the quantity but quality.  There are more easy problems and not enough ‘skill building’ problems in the general homework, leading up to the last few problems.  The examples in class are very basic and do not really help to build ability.  This also detracts from motivation to come to class.”

“Homework is challenging but lecture explanations are too simple à they do not provide hints for tough homework problems.”

 

 


E. Additional questions:

 

At the instructor’s request in one section, I asked the students to comment more on the worksheets.  First, I took a poll to get a sense of how many of the students find the worksheets to be helpful – the results were that about half of the students said worksheets are helpful, and half said that they are not helpful.  So, I asked students who find the worksheets helpful to explain why.  These students said they’re helpful for a number of reasons: they’re relevant and like the homework, they “walk through” problems step-by-step, and students get to work on worksheets in groups, which helps them see how other students solve problems.  Then I asked students who find the worksheets not helpful to explain why.  Again there was a variety of reasons: the worksheets are not relevant, they’re too complicated, they can’t cover all the topics, and they’re simple, like the lecture.  Some students mentioned that they find the worksheets helpful, but that there is too much time spent on them – they’d like more time to ask questions about their homework.